Community Infrastructure Registry · Cohort 1 · 2025

Which tools can communities trust?

An independent Ethical Technology Assessment of eleven communication and coordination platforms — including Signal, Matrix, Discourse, Hylo, Open Future Coalition, Mighty Networks, and more — evaluated for agricultural and commons-based community infrastructure use.

11Tools Assessed
18ETA Questions
4Entry Gates
Tier 2Confidence
ETA Framework v1.0 G1 Transparency 10pts G2 Rights & Control 10pts G3 No Abuse 10pts G4 Stewardship 10pts Data Ethics 15pts Interoperability 15pts Commons Fit 15pts Accessibility 15pts
01 — Individual Assessments
Full ETA Scorecards
Each card links to a fully editable dynamic scorecard where you can submit your own assessment as an independent reviewer. Scores are peer-reviewed (Tier 2 confidence).
02 — Side-by-Side Comparison
All Tools · All Dimensions
Direct category-by-category comparison. Higher scores indicate stronger ethical alignment for community infrastructure use.
Recommended · Community Infrastructure Stack
Signal + Hylo + Infomaniak — The Sovereign Stack
Signal for encrypted comms (88), Hylo for coordination (82), and Infomaniak for hosting (85). Together these form a fully ETA-eligible, non-extractive, commons-aligned technology stack for agricultural communities.
88Signal
85Infomaniak
82Hylo
Assessment Methodology & Confidence

Framework: ETA v1.0 Software Assessment at Tier 2 (Peer-Reviewed) confidence (×1.00). Scores reflect publicly available documentation, privacy policies, source code, and independent audits as of Q1 2025.

Gate structure: All four entry gates (G1–G4) are binary pass/fail, 10 points each. Any gate failure prevents ETA Eligible status regardless of category scores. Category questions scored 0–5, multiplied by 3 = category points.

Categories: Data Ethics — data minimization, purpose limitation, secondary use controls. Interoperability — open standards, API quality, data portability. Commons Fit — open source licensing, self-hosting viability, community governance. Accessibility — pricing equity, multilingual support, onboarding friction.

Critical stance: Marketing claims are not accepted at face value. WhatsApp's E2E encryption is acknowledged but does not compensate for extensive metadata collection and Meta data sharing, failing G2 and G3. Proton's score is reduced by its closed backend and 2021 IP logging incident under court order.

Contribute: Use the "Add Your Review" button on any scorecard to submit an independent assessment. Community reviews aggregate to update confidence tiers. Future versions will integrate a database backend for registry persistence.